Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

indus Communication Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

indus Communication vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 05, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/41014

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

indus Communication

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Excerpt

1. the appellants, m/s. indus communication are engaged in the service of publications job and non-publication job. an order issued by the deputy commissioner, service tax on 28-11-2001 confirmed a demand of rs. 24,337/- plus interest in respect of advertising services provided by them during october, 1998 to march, 1999.2. being aggrieved, the appellants filed the appeal before the commissioner (appeals). they pleaded before him that the adjudicating authority has wrongly calculated the service tax at 5% on all the services, while they were engaged in the services of publication and non-publication job whose rate should be 0.75% and 5% respectively.they relied upon a circular issued by advertising agencies association of india to its members. though they could not cite any notification issued by the government in this regard, they pleaded that the rate should be 0.75% on publication job and 5% on non-publication job. the commissioner (appeals) found that appellants had provided services amounting to rs. 11,07,910/- and the service tax in respect of advertising services at the rate of 5% during that period. now, the appellants are before us.3. we have carefully examined the case records available and heard both sides. we find that the demand was raised by the department taking into consideration, a sum of rs. 11,07,910/- as the value of service provided by the appellants during the period. this fact was never questioned before the lower authorities, nor before us now. what is questioned here is the applicable rate of service tax. instead of 5%, the appellants seek to pay at the rate of 0.75%. we do not find any justification for this claim in view of the fact that the appellants have failed to produce any exemption notification issued by the government to issue an order in favour of their contention. in the result, the appeal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. The appellants, M/s. Indus Communication are engaged in the service of publications job and non-publication job. An order issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Service Tax on 28-11-2001 confirmed a demand of Rs. 24,337/- plus interest in respect of advertising services provided by them during October, 1998 to March, 1999.

2. Being aggrieved, the appellants filed the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). They pleaded before him that the adjudicating authority has wrongly calculated the service tax at 5% on all the services, while they were engaged in the services of publication and non-publication job whose rate should be 0.75% and 5% respectively.

They relied upon a circular issued by Advertising Agencies Association of India to its members. Though they could not cite any Notification issued by the Government in this regard, they pleaded that the rate should be 0.75% on publication job and 5% on non-publication job. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that appellants had provided services amounting to Rs. 11,07,910/- and the service tax in respect of advertising services at the rate of 5% during that period. Now, the appellants are before us.

3. We have carefully examined the case records available and heard both sides. We find that the demand was raised by the Department taking into consideration, a sum of Rs. 11,07,910/- as the value of service provided by the appellants during the period. This fact was never questioned before the lower authorities, nor before us now. What is questioned here is the applicable rate of service tax. Instead of 5%, the appellants seek to pay at the rate of 0.75%. We do not find any justification for this claim in view of the fact that the appellants have failed to produce any exemption notification issued by the Government to issue an order in favour of their contention. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial