Gangeshwar Limited Vs. Cce

Gangeshwar Limited vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 05, 2005

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/41012

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/41012
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: M T K.C.
Decided On: Dec 05, 2005
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gangeshwar Limited

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

1. this application for restoration of appeal is filed on the ground that on 27.4.2005 when the appeal came up for hearing, the assistant of the counsel sought adjournment as the decision of the larger bench on the issue involved was not received by them by that time. however, the appeal was dismissed by following the decision of the larger bench in case of jaypee rewa plant v. cce, raipur (t). the applicants pleaded that they have claimed welding electrodes as capital goods and the appeal was decided without taking cognizance of the fact that the request of adjournment was made by the assistant of the counsel.2. considering the above said circumstances, the appeal is restored to its original number and shall be posted for hearing the roa application is allowed accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. This application for restoration of appeal is filed on the ground that on 27.4.2005 when the appeal came up for hearing, the Assistant of the Counsel sought adjournment as the decision of the Larger Bench on the issue involved was not received by them by that time. However, the appeal was dismissed by following the decision of the Larger Bench in case of Jaypee Rewa Plant v. CCE, Raipur (T). The applicants pleaded that they have claimed Welding Electrodes as capital goods and the appeal was decided without taking cognizance of the fact that the request of adjournment was made by the Assistant of the Counsel.

2. Considering the above said circumstances, the appeal is restored to its original number and shall be posted for hearing The ROA application is allowed accordingly.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Gangeshwar Limited vs Cce Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M T K.C.