Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Faiyaz Shamim Vs. Cc

Faiyaz Shamim vs Cc

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 05, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/41005

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Faiyaz Shamim

Respondent

Cc

Excerpt

1. the applicants are seeking restoration of appeal on the ground that it was dismissed for non-prosecution. on the date of hearing i.e. on 12^th august, 2005, the counsel of the applicants could not appear for hearing as he had to attend to his wife, who had suffered fracture in her hand due to fall and in such a situation, the counsel could not intimate the tribunal for adjournment.2. considering the facts stated in the application, the appeal is restored to its original number and it will come up for hearing in its due course.

Full Judgment

1. The applicants are seeking restoration of appeal on the ground that it was dismissed for non-prosecution. On the date of hearing i.e. on 12^th August, 2005, the counsel of the applicants could not appear for hearing as he had to attend to his wife, who had suffered fracture in her hand due to fall and in such a situation, the Counsel could not intimate the Tribunal for adjournment.

2. Considering the facts stated in the application, the appeal is restored to its original number and it will come up for hearing in its due course.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial