Skip to content

Faiyaz Shamim Vs. Cc - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Judge
AppellantFaiyaz Shamim
RespondentCc

Excerpt

1. the applicants are seeking restoration of appeal on the ground that it was dismissed for non-prosecution. on the date of hearing i.e. on 12^th august, 2005, the counsel of the applicants could not appear for hearing as he had to attend to his wife, who had suffered fracture in her hand due to fall and in such a situation, the counsel could not intimate the tribunal for adjournment.2. considering the facts stated in the application, the appeal is restored to its original number and it will come up for hearing in its due course.

Judgment

1. The applicants are seeking restoration of appeal on the ground that it was dismissed for non-prosecution. On the date of hearing i.e. on 12^th August, 2005, the counsel of the applicants could not appear for hearing as he had to attend to his wife, who had suffered fracture in her hand due to fall and in such a situation, the Counsel could not intimate the Tribunal for adjournment.

2. Considering the facts stated in the application, the appeal is restored to its original number and it will come up for hearing in its due course.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial