Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Customs Vs. Eimco Elecon (India) Ltd.

Collector of Customs vs Eimco Elecon (India) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 16, 1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/4022

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Customs

Respondent

Eimco Elecon (India) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(1989)(42)ELT259TriDel

Excerpt

1. the issue that arises in this appeal is that whether the "load haul dumpers" is a motor vehicle for transport of persons, goods or materials, assessable under heading 87.02(1) or is a "loading machine" assessable under heading 84.22.2. shri j. gopinath, sdr submitted that the board had made a reference to cccn and after addressing the dgtd has decided to classify the "load haul dumpers" under heading 84.22. he, therefore, states that he has instructions not to press this appeal.in the circumstance stated by the sdr, the appeal is dismissed as "not pressed".

Full Judgment

1. The issue that arises in this appeal is that whether the "Load Haul Dumpers" is a motor vehicle for transport of persons, goods or materials, assessable under Heading 87.02(1) or is a "Loading Machine" assessable under Heading 84.22.

2. Shri J. Gopinath, SDR submitted that the Board had made a reference to CCCN and after addressing the DGTD has decided to classify the "Load Haul Dumpers" under Heading 84.22. He, therefore, states that he has instructions not to press this appeal.

In the circumstance stated by the SDR, the appeal is dismissed as "not pressed".

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial