Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Electropneumatics and Vs. Cce

Electropneumatics and vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 31, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/40125

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Electropneumatics and

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

2. m/s electropneumatics & hydraulics (india) pvt. ltd., midc, marol industrial area, andheri (east), mumbai - 400 093, are engaged in the manufacture of machine tools. they have utilized the services of goods transport operators during the period from 16.11.1997 to 01.06.1998 in connection with their manufacturing activities. however, they failed to pay service tax in respect of the services used by them. they claimed exemption of the notification no. 43/97-st, dated 05.11.97 on the ground that they are ssi unit. but the said contention was negated by the impugned order-in-appeal. show cause notice was adjudicated by the dy.commissioner confirming the demand of rs. 48,860/- with interest and imposed penalty of rs. 500/- under section 75a, penalty of rs. 48,860/- under section 76 and penalty of rs. 1000/- under section 77 of the act.3. on filing appeal, the commissioner of central excise (appeals), mumbai, rejected the same on the ground that the notification is applicable to transport operator and whereas in the instant case, the appellants are not transport operator, but, duty liability was cast on its user. there is divergent view on the same in the appellant's own case, which has been adjudicated by the commissioner(appeals), pune. he has granted exemption from payment of service tax under the said notification.4. after having considered the matter at length and hearing both sides, i am of the view that there is prima facie case in favour of the appellants. accordingly, complete waiver is granted from pre-deposit and stay is also from its recovery, pending disposal of the appeal.

Full Judgment

2. M/s Electropneumatics & Hydraulics (India) Pvt. Ltd., MIDC, Marol Industrial Area, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 093, are engaged in the manufacture of machine tools. They have utilized the services of goods transport operators during the period from 16.11.1997 to 01.06.1998 in connection with their manufacturing activities. However, they failed to pay Service Tax in respect of the services used by them. They claimed exemption of the notification no. 43/97-ST, dated 05.11.97 on the ground that they are SSI unit. But the said contention was negated by the impugned Order-in-appeal. Show cause notice was adjudicated by the Dy.Commissioner confirming the demand of Rs. 48,860/- with interest and imposed penalty of Rs. 500/- under Section 75A, penalty of Rs. 48,860/- under Section 76 and penalty of Rs. 1000/- under Section 77 of the Act.

3. On filing appeal, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai, rejected the same on the ground that the notification is applicable to transport operator and whereas in the instant case, the appellants are not transport operator, but, duty liability was cast on its user. There is divergent view on the same in the appellant's own case, which has been adjudicated by the Commissioner(Appeals), Pune. He has granted exemption from payment of Service Tax under the said notification.

4. After having considered the matter at length and hearing both sides, I am of the view that there is prima facie case in favour of the appellants. Accordingly, complete waiver is granted from pre-deposit and stay is also from its recovery, pending disposal of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial