Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

ispat Industries Ltd. Vs. Ccex

ispat Industries Ltd. vs Ccex

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 09, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/39944

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ispat Industries Ltd.

Respondent

Ccex

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. under the impugned orders, the lower authorities have denied refund of accumulated cenvat credit of rs. 1,98,82,260/- to the appellants. the appellants have exported the final products during the period july, 2002 and september, 2002 and the shipments were made under the depb scheme as evidenced from the export documents. hence, it is not in doubt that they have not availed of any drawback of the input duty. it is the stated policy of the govt. to promote exports and the minimum assistance the authorities below can extend is not to cause impediments in implementing clear policies of the govt. it is no one's case that the exporter should bear the domestic levy on inputs or pass it in turn to the foreign buyer making indian goods dearer in the foreign market. in the facts of this case, the appellants are clearly eligible to get refund of accumulated cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs against exports made. hence, we allow the appeal with consequential benefit to the appellants.the operative part of the order was pronounced in the open court on the date of hearing on 09.08.2005.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides. Under the impugned orders, the lower authorities have denied refund of accumulated Cenvat credit of Rs. 1,98,82,260/- to the appellants. The appellants have exported the final products during the period July, 2002 and September, 2002 and the shipments were made under the DEPB scheme as evidenced from the export documents. Hence, it is not in doubt that they have not availed of any drawback of the input duty. It is the stated policy of the Govt. to promote exports and the minimum assistance the authorities below can extend is not to cause impediments in implementing clear policies of the Govt. It is no one's case that the exporter should bear the domestic levy on inputs or pass it in turn to the foreign buyer making Indian goods dearer in the foreign market. In the facts of this case, the appellants are clearly eligible to get refund of accumulated Cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs against exports made. Hence, we allow the appeal with consequential benefit to the appellants.

The operative part of the order was pronounced in the open court on the date of hearing on 09.08.2005.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial