Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hexacom India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Hexacom India Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Aug 01, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/39862

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hexacom India Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2006)STR38

Excerpt

2. the applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of penalty. the amount of service tax has already been deposited by the applicant. in this case the benefit of service tax credit has been denied on the ground that input service and output services do not fall under the same category.3. the contention of the applicant is that the applicant had taken on lease the telephone lines of bsnl, which is a registered assessee under service tax under the category of telephone services. the applicant is regularly paying service tax on the lease lines and bsnl is continuously charging it from the applicant in respect of the telephone services provided by them and the applicants are also providing telephone services, therefore, input and output services fall under the same category. keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as the amount of service tax has already been deposited, the pre-deposit of whole of the penalty is waived for hearing of the appeal. the stay petition is allowed.

Full Judgment

2. The applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of penalty. The amount of Service Tax has already been deposited by the applicant. In this case the benefit of Service Tax credit has been denied on the ground that input service and output services do not fall under the same category.

3. The contention of the applicant is that the applicant had taken on lease the telephone lines of BSNL, which is a registered assessee under Service Tax under the category of telephone services. The applicant is regularly paying Service Tax on the lease lines and BSNL is continuously charging it from the applicant in respect of the telephone services provided by them and the applicants are also providing telephone services, therefore, input and output services fall under the same category. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as the amount of Service Tax has already been deposited, the pre-deposit of whole of the penalty is waived for hearing of the appeal. The stay petition is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial