Cce Vs. Vridheshwar Ssk Ltd.

Cce vs Vridheshwar Ssk Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jul 13, 2005

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/39698

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/39698
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: W R Archana
Decided On: Jul 13, 2005
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce

Respondent

Vridheshwar Ssk Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the amount involved in the present appeal is only rs. 5,288/-. the commissioner(appeals) has held that the provisions of rule 57cc are not applicable to bagasse and press-mud, which are residues and waste from the food industries. he has further held that these are not obtained from the processing of any inputs, on which modvat credit was obtained but are only residues of non-dutiable inputs.2. inasmuch as the amount involved is only rs.5,288/- and the commissioner(appeals) order prima facie appears to be correct, i do not find any justifiable reason to admit the appeal on record. the same is accordingly dismissed as not admitted.

Full Judgment

1. The amount involved in the present appeal is only Rs. 5,288/-. The Commissioner(Appeals) has held that the provisions of Rule 57CC are not applicable to bagasse and press-mud, which are residues and waste from the food industries. He has further held that these are not obtained from the processing of any inputs, on which modvat credit was obtained but are only residues of non-dutiable inputs.

2. Inasmuch as the amount involved is only Rs.5,288/- and the Commissioner(Appeals) order prima facie appears to be correct, I do not find any justifiable reason to admit the appeal on record. The same is accordingly dismissed as not admitted.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Cce vs Vridheshwar Ssk Ltd. Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge W R Archana