Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhogawati Ssk Ltd. Vs. Cce

Bhogawati Ssk Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 13, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38760

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhogawati Ssk Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

1. after hearing both sides for some time on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of rs. 8,64,372/-, i find that it is possible to decide the appeal itself today as the issue in dispute stands covered in favour of the assessee by the earlier decisions of the tribunal; hence after waiving pre-deposit, the appeal itself is taken up for disposal.2. the issue in dispute is whether the appellants herein who are registered co-op. socy engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses are liable to service tax as they had availed the service of goods transport operator. the period in dipsute is november 16th 1977 to june 1st 1998.3. i have heard both sides and find that the issue is no longer res-integra as it has been settled by the tribunal's decision in the case of l.h. sugar factories ltd. v. cce meerut ii holding that even though persons receiving taxable service of goods transport operators are deemed liable to pay tax under section 69 of finance act, 1944, they are not liable to pay tax as the liabiltiy to file returns is cast on them only under section 71a of finance act and not under section 70 and they are not covered under section 73 of the act. the said order has been followed in subsequent decisions including that int eh case of raigad sahakari sakhar karkhana ltd. v. cce pune-i (order no. a/591/wzb/2004). following the ratio of the above orders, i set aside the demand of service tax in the present case and allow the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. After hearing both sides for some time on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of Rs. 8,64,372/-, I find that it is possible to decide the appeal itself today as the issue in dispute stands covered in favour of the assessee by the earlier decisions of the Tribunal; hence after waiving pre-deposit, the appeal itself is taken up for disposal.

2. The issue in dispute is whether the appellants herein who are registered Co-Op. Socy engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses are liable to service tax as they had availed the service of Goods Transport Operator. The period in dipsute is November 16th 1977 to June 1st 1998.

3. I have heard both sides and find that the issue is no longer res-integra as it has been settled by the Tribunal's decision in the case of L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. v. CCE Meerut II holding that even though persons receiving taxable service of goods transport operators are deemed liable to pay tax under Section 69 of Finance Act, 1944, they are not liable to pay tax as the liabiltiy to file returns is cast on them only under Section 71A of Finance Act and not under Section 70 and they are not covered under Section 73 of the Act. The said order has been followed in subsequent decisions including that int eh case of Raigad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CCE Pune-I (Order No. A/591/WZB/2004). Following the ratio of the above orders, I set aside the demand of service tax in the present case and allow the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial