Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Mysore Cements Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 26, 2008
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/386780
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.A. No. 611 of 2008
Subject
Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Mysore Cements Ltd.

Advocate Amarchand and; Mangaldas, Advs.

Legal References

Acts
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391
Reported In
[2009]149CompCas50(Kar)
Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

- labour & services voluntary retirement scheme: [p.d.dinakaran, c.j. & v.g.sabhahit,j] state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, section 63 - state bank of mysore employees (pension) regulations, 1995, regulation 209 - pension regulation framed in 1995 providing for voluntary retirement made effective retrospectively from 1.11.1993 held, when bank has accepted position that employees who were qualified to take retirement voluntarily as on 1.11.1993, but in absence of statutory provision for voluntary retirement, had to resign from service, were deemed to have retired voluntarily with pension as retrial benefit, bank is not justified in not extending benefit to present petitioner-employee, who, though qualified to retire voluntarily, had to send his letter of resignation on 3.8.1994 - direction given to bank to extend benefit of voluntary retirement to present petitioner-employee also as it had done in case of other employees who were similarly placed.....is filed praying for a direction to convene the meeting of the equity shareholders of the applicant-company under section 391 of the companies act, 1956. the applicant has also prayed for dispensation of the meeting of the preference shareholders of the company as the only preference shareholder has given no objection. the applicant has also prayed for dispensation of the meeting of the unsecured creditors.2. the scheme of amalgamation is proposed to amalgamate the transferor company with the applicant-company. for the said purpose a direction is sought from this court to convene the meeting of the equity shareholders.there is only one preference shareholder who has given a letter of no objection as per annexure m. hence, the meeting of preference shareholders is dispensed with.3. according to the applicant, the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company are not in any manner affected by the scheme nor is there any compromise of arrangement envisaged in the scheme with the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company. the scheme does not contemplate any variation in the rights of the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company in any manner whatsoever. further, the.....

Full Judgment

Mohan Shantanagoudar, J.

1. This application is filed praying for a direction to convene the meeting of the equity shareholders of the applicant-company under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The applicant has also prayed for dispensation of the meeting of the preference shareholders of the company as the only preference shareholder has given no objection. The applicant has also prayed for dispensation of the meeting of the unsecured creditors.

2. The scheme of amalgamation is proposed to amalgamate the transferor company with the applicant-company. For the said purpose a direction is sought from this Court to convene the meeting of the equity shareholders.

There is only one preference shareholder who has given a letter of no objection as per annexure M. Hence, the meeting of preference shareholders is dispensed with.

3. According to the applicant, the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company are not in any manner affected by the scheme nor is there any compromise of arrangement envisaged in the scheme with the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company. The scheme does not contemplate any variation in the rights of the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company in any manner whatsoever. Further, the applicant-company is satisfying the amounts payable to its sundry/trade creditors which arise on day-to-day basis from the business activities of the applicant-company. The scheme upon becoming effective by the merged entity, would be in a further stronger financial position to meet its current liabilities as they arise in the original course of business. The applicant-company has also currently sufficient cash and bank balances to meet the dues payable to the trade creditors. In view of the same, this Court proposes to dispense the applicant from convening and holding of meeting of the unsecured creditors of the applicant-company to further approval to the scheme of amalgamation.

There is no secured creditors to the applicant-company. The meeting of the equity shareholders shall be held as per the following calendar of events:

I. Date of meeting and time : Wednesday, August 6,2008.

Equity shareholders 9.30 a.m.

II. Venue of meeting : Mysore Cements Employees Staff Club Audi-

torium,

Mysore Cements Ltd.

P.O., Ammasandra District,

Karnataka-572 211.

III. Chairman of the meeting : Mr. Ashish Guha

(Managing Director) or failing him

Mr. Amitabha Ghosh (Director)

IV. Quorum : (a) For equity shareholders

: 5 Members present either in person or proxy.

6. The applicant-company shall publish notice in The Hindu and Udhaya-vani newspapers with regard to the holding of meeting of the equity shareholders. Notice should be published about 21 days prior to holding of meeting. The application is allowed accordingly.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial