Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Grasim Industries Ltd. vs C.C.E.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 31, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38626

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Grasim Industries Ltd.

Respondent

C.C.E.

Excerpt

2. the issue involved in this appeal is regarding the collection of amount as insurance charges. the revenue wants to include in the assessable value of the goods.3. we find that this issue is now covered by hon'ble supreme court decision in the case of baroda electric meters ltd. v. collector of central excise, reported in 1997 94 elt 13 (sc) and in the case of indian oxygen ltd. v. collector of central excise, reported in 1988 (36) elt 723 (sc). in view of the above decision the demand on account of excess insurance charges collected by the appellants is not sustainable. hence, set aside. the appeal is allowed.

Full Judgment

2. The issue involved in this appeal is regarding the collection of amount as Insurance charges. The Revenue wants to include in the assessable value of the goods.

3. We find that this issue is now covered by Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, reported in 1997 94 ELT 13 (SC) and in the case of Indian Oxygen Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, reported in 1988 (36) ELT 723 (SC). In view of the above decision the demand on account of excess Insurance charges collected by the appellants is not sustainable. Hence, set aside. The appeal is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial