Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pacific Export Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Pacific Export vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 10, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38401

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pacific Export

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(185)ELT147Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. this matter was adjourned many times, on the request of the department, since the order impugned of cc (imports), mumbai who has adjudicated this case was beyond his jurisdiction was the preliminary point raised by the id. advocate for the appellants.2. inspite of repeated adjournments no orders, authority transferring the case to cce (import) new customs house mumbai have been produced.it is found that show cause notice dated 16-7-1997 was to be decided by the cc (jnpt) and issued by cc exports (mumbai) seeking to show cause notice to him. the order, was to be passed by cc (export). the order impugned herein passed without any jurisdiction with cc (imports) is set aside and the matters remitted to the appropriate authority with directions to rehear the appellants and decide afresh.

Full Judgment

1. This matter was adjourned many times, on the request of the Department, since the order impugned of CC (Imports), Mumbai who has adjudicated this case was beyond his jurisdiction was the preliminary point raised by the Id. advocate for the appellants.

2. Inspite of repeated adjournments no orders, authority transferring the case to CCE (Import) New Customs House Mumbai have been produced.

It is found that Show Cause Notice dated 16-7-1997 was to be decided by the CC (JNPT) and issued by CC Exports (Mumbai) seeking to Show Cause Notice to him. The order, was to be passed by CC (Export). The order impugned herein passed without any jurisdiction with CC (Imports) is set aside and the matters remitted to the appropriate authority with directions to rehear the appellants and decide afresh.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial