Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Northern Railways Mechanical Vs. C.C.E.

Northern Railways Mechanical vs C.C.E.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 21, 2005
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38193

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Northern Railways Mechanical

Respondent

C.C.E.

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(183)ELT210TriDel

Excerpt

.....was in force.2. mrs. suvira lal, learned advocate, submitted that the mechanical workshop manufacture railway wagons for use of the indian railway; that wagons are exempt from payment of central excise duty; that during the course of manufacture of railway wagons, ferrous waste and scrap falling under heading 72.04 of the schedule to the central excise tariff emerges which is being sent by them to the controller of stores, northern railways for sale through auction; that the duty has been demanded from them for the period from 1-3-1994 to 15-3-1995 under the impugned order on the ground that the notification no. 171/1988-c.e., dated 30-5-1988 which has exempted ferrous waste and scrap was rescinded by the central government by notification no. 64/94-c.e., dated 1-3-1994. the learned advocate, further, submitted that subsequently exemption from payment of duty was allowed to them by notification no. 23/95-c.e., dated 16-3-1995: that as the ferrous waste and scrap was exempted earlier to march, 1994 and also w.e.f. march, 1995 the department should not have demanded the duty from them; that in any case the materials out of which waste and scrap has been generated are duty paid, and therefore, duty cannot be demanded again on the scrap; that they were under the bonafide belief that scrap generated in a workshop of railway department is exempted from payment of duty, and therefore, the question of imposing any penalty does not arise. we also heard shri o. p. arora, learned sdr.3. ferrous waste and scrap is chargeable to duty under heading 72.04 of the central excise tariff. as per note 8(a) of section xvi of the central excise tariff metal waste and scrap means, waste and scrap from the manufacture or mechanical working of the metals, and metal goods definitely not useable as such because of breakage, cutting up, wear or other reasons. in the present matter it is not in dispute that the waste and scrap is generated during the manufacture of railway.....

Full Judgment

1. In this appeal, filed by M/s. Northern Railways Mechanical Works, the issue relates to the demand of duty on waste and scrap of iron & steels as during the period no exemption notification was in force.

2. Mrs. Suvira Lal, learned Advocate, submitted that the mechanical workshop manufacture railway wagons for use of the Indian Railway; that wagons are exempt from payment of Central Excise duty; that during the course of manufacture of railway wagons, ferrous waste and scrap falling under Heading 72.04 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff emerges which is being sent by them to the Controller of Stores, Northern Railways for sale through auction; that the duty has been demanded from them for the period from 1-3-1994 to 15-3-1995 under the impugned Order on the ground that the Notification No. 171/1988-C.E., dated 30-5-1988 which has exempted ferrous waste and scrap was rescinded by the Central Government by Notification No. 64/94-C.E., dated 1-3-1994. The learned Advocate, further, submitted that subsequently exemption from payment of duty was allowed to them by Notification No. 23/95-C.E., dated 16-3-1995: that as the ferrous waste and scrap was exempted earlier to March, 1994 and also w.e.f. March, 1995 the department should not have demanded the duty from them; that in any case the materials out of which waste and scrap has been generated are duty paid, and therefore, duty cannot be demanded again on the scrap; that they were under the bonafide belief that scrap generated in a workshop of railway department is exempted from payment of duty, and therefore, the question of imposing any penalty does not arise. We also heard Shri O. P. Arora, learned SDR.3. Ferrous waste and scrap is chargeable to duty under Heading 72.04 of the Central Excise Tariff. As per Note 8(a) of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Metal waste and scrap means, waste and scrap from the manufacture or mechanical working of the metals, and metal goods definitely not useable as such because of breakage, cutting up, wear or other reasons. In the present matter it is not in dispute that the waste and scrap is generated during the manufacture of railway wagon.

Thus the scrap satisfies the definition given in Note 8(a) to Section XVI as it is generated during the process of manufacture and it is liable to Central Excise duty irrespective of the fact that it has been generated out of duty paid material. Central Excise duty is payable as per the rate of duty mentioned in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act in terms of Section 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. It is not in dispute that during the relevant period no exemption exempting waste and scrap was in existence inasmuch as Notification No.171/1988-C.E., dated 13-5-1988 which used to exempt ferrous waste and scrap had been rescinded by Notification No. 64/1994, dated 1-3-1994.

After the notification No. 171/1988 was rescinded the Central Excise duty became payable on ferrous waste and scrap. The exemption was again granted by Notification No. 23/1995 dated 16-3-1995. In view of this the duty amount confirmed against the Appellants is upheld. We, however, agree with the learned Advocate that no penalty is imposable on the Appellants as they were under the bonafide belief that they being department of Central Government are not liable to pay Central Excise duty. We, therefore, set aside the penalty imposed on them.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial