Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Central Excise Vs. United Flock Paper Mfg.

Collector of Central Excise vs United Flock Paper Mfg.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 10, 1987
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/3805

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Central Excise

Respondent

United Flock Paper Mfg.

Legal References

Reported In
(1987)(13)LC899Tri(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. in responce to notice of date of hearing the respondents by their communication dated 20-6-1987 received in the tribunal on 22-6-1987, submitted that being a very small unit they are unable to bear the expenses of travelling to delhi on the date of hearing. they have made written submissions. we have, therefore, heard shri a.s. sunder rajan, departmental representative for the appellant and perused the papers.2. the issue for decision is eligibility of the respondents to benefit of exemption notification no. 68/76 dated 16-3-1976 in respect of what is called flock paper. shri sunder rajan submitted that the issue was squarely covered against the respondent by the decision of the tribunal order no. 446/84-c dated 23-7-1984 parties modern industrial corporation v. collector of central excise & others. after hearing, shri sunder rajan, the appeal was closed for orders.3. it was however, noticed by the bench that in decision dated, august 25, 1987 reported in 1987 (31) elt 321 parties modern industrial corporation v. collector of central excise & others, the decision relied on by shri sunder rajan appears to have been reversed by the supreme court. the hearing was therefore, reopened and the decision shown to shri sunder rajan. after seeing this decision, shri sunder rajan agreed that the supreme court decision had reversed the tribunal decision and in view of this supreme court decision which related to the same goods block paper and the notification no. 68/76-c.e., the corresponding period also being the same, the appellant had no case before the tribunal.4. following the supreme court decision (supra), the appeal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. In responce to notice of date of hearing the respondents by their communication dated 20-6-1987 received in the Tribunal on 22-6-1987, submitted that being a very small unit they are unable to bear the expenses of travelling to Delhi on the date of hearing. They have made written submissions. We have, therefore, heard Shri A.S. Sunder Rajan, Departmental Representative for the appellant and perused the papers.

2. The issue for decision is eligibility of the respondents to benefit of exemption Notification No. 68/76 dated 16-3-1976 in respect of what is called Flock Paper. Shri Sunder Rajan submitted that the issue was squarely covered against the respondent by the decision of the Tribunal Order No. 446/84-C dated 23-7-1984 parties Modern Industrial Corporation v. Collector of Central Excise & Others. After hearing, Shri Sunder Rajan, the appeal was closed for orders.

3. It was however, noticed by the Bench that in decision dated, August 25, 1987 reported in 1987 (31) ELT 321 parties Modern Industrial Corporation v. Collector of Central Excise & Others, the decision relied on by Shri Sunder Rajan appears to have been reversed by the Supreme Court. The hearing was therefore, reopened and the decision shown to Shri Sunder Rajan. After seeing this decision, Shri Sunder Rajan agreed that the Supreme Court decision had reversed the Tribunal decision and in view of this Supreme Court decision which related to the same goods Block Paper and the Notification No. 68/76-C.E., the corresponding period also being the same, the appellant had no case before the Tribunal.

4. Following the Supreme Court decision (supra), the appeal is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial