Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.C.E. Vs. Progressive Organics (P) Ltd.

C.C.E. vs Progressive Organics (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 08, 2005
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38008

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E.

Respondent

Progressive Organics (P) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(184)ELT221TriDel

Excerpt

.....in the impugned scn for denying s.s.i., exemption to the appellants. as such, the adjudicating authority has traveled beyond the scope of allegation contained in the s.c.n.3. in the present appeal also, the revenue is contended that village surjuh has to be treated as not falling within rural area in view of is forming part of muzaffarnagar development authority area.4. the notification contains definition of 'rural area', which reads as under : "rural area' means the area comprised in a village ad defined in the land revenue records excluding (i) the area under any municipal corporation, town area committee, cantonment board or notified area committee or (ii) any area that my be notified as in urban area by the central government of state government" 5. it is clearly for the revenue authorities to certify whether any area is rural area or not. in the present case, the juridictional tehsildar has certified that the village in which the assessee's unit is located is rural area. the commissioner has rightly gone by the certificate of the tehsildar. in these facts and circumstances, there is no merit in the revenue's appeal. it fails and is rejected.

Full Judgment

1. None appeared for the respondent assessee. Accordingly, the appeal is being disposed of after hearing the learned SDR and perusing the records.

2. The dispute in the present case is about the exemption under Notification No. 9/01. Under the Adjudication order, the exemption was denied to the assessee on the ground that the assessee was not located in a rural area. In appeal the Commissioner (Appeals) has overturned that finding with the following observations : In the instance case, the department has not adduced any evidence that village Sujruh has been declared as an urban area, whereas the appellant shave produced a certificate dt. 25.7.2000 of Tehsildar, Muzaffarnagar, which is placed on record, Certifying that village Sujruh is situated beyond the limits of Municipal Committee, Muzaffarnagar and alls under the rural area, as per the orders of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The said certificate duly satisfies the definition of rural area as given in the said Notification, since it has been issued by the Land Revenue Officer(s) of the State of Uttar Pradesh on the basis of land revenue records. The appellants have also produced a letter dt. 07.12.2002 from the Executive Engineer, M.D.A. which is also placed on record, clarifying that village Sujruh, though within the limits M.D.A., is out of the limits of Municipal Committee, Muzaffarnagar and falls under the rural area. Thus, if any area is notified under the jurisdiction of any development authority, it does not necessarily mean that such area has been declared as urban area and the adjudicating authority has wrongly interpreted the word "urban area" taking it as notified area under the jurisdiction of M.D.A. Here, it is also observed that the exclusion clause (i) of Explanation (H) to the said Notification has not been involved in the impugned SCN for denying S.S.I., exemption to the appellants. As such, the adjudicating authority has traveled beyond the scope of allegation contained in the S.C.N.3. In the present appeal also, the Revenue is contended that village Surjuh has to be treated as not falling within rural area in view of is forming part of Muzaffarnagar Development Authority area.

4. The Notification contains definition of 'rural area', which reads as under : "Rural area' means the area comprised in a village ad defined in the land revenue records excluding (i) the area under any municipal corporation, town area committee, cantonment board or notified area committee or (ii) any area that my be notified as in urban area by the Central Government of State Government" 5. It is clearly for the Revenue authorities to certify whether any area is rural area or not. In the present case, the juridictional Tehsildar has certified that the Village in which the assessee's unit is located is rural area. The Commissioner has rightly gone by the certificate of the Tehsildar. In these facts and circumstances, there is no merit in the Revenue's appeal. It fails and is rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial