Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Electro Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Customs vs Electro Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Feb 02, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/37940

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Customs

Respondent

Electro Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(184)ELT96Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the application filed by the revenue for stay of operation of the order of the commissioner of customs (appeals), who held that the benefit of exemption in terms of notification no. 6/2002, dated 1-3-2002 at sr. no. 21 of table thereof is available to roasted molybdenum ore concentrate imported by the respondent herein, is allowed, as prima facie case for the stay has been made out on the ground that once roasted ore concentrate is received in the premises, it should be assessed and charged to duty, as sr. no. 21 of the notification 6/2002 exempts only ores from excise duty.

Full Judgment

1. The application filed by the Revenue for stay of operation of the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), who held that the benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No. 6/2002, dated 1-3-2002 at Sr. No. 21 of table thereof is available to Roasted Molybdenum ore Concentrate imported by the respondent herein, is allowed, as prima facie case for the stay has been made out on the ground that once Roasted Ore Concentrate is received in the premises, it should be assessed and charged to duty, as Sr. No. 21 of the Notification 6/2002 exempts only ores from excise duty.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial