Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rolcon Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Rolcon Engineering Co. Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 24, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/37510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rolcon Engineering Co. Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(99)ECC426

Excerpt

2. the appellant filed this appeal against order-in-appeal passed by the commissioner (appeals) whereby the commissioner (appeals) held that link plates and link pins manufactured by the appellant and cleared to m/s. elecon engineering co. are classifiable under heading 8431.00 of the central excise tariff, as parts of material handling equipment. the appellant claimed the classification under heading 7308.20 as part of industrial chains.3. the contention of the appellant is that they are manufacturing industrial chains which are classifiable under heading 73.08 of tariff and these link plates are being used as part of the industrial chains, therefore, are rightly classifiable alongwith the industrial chains.4. the contention of the revenue is that link plates and links pins which are manufactured as part of industrial chains are classifiable under heading 7308.02 of the central excise tariff whereas the link plates and link pins, in dispute, are manufactured by them on the special design supplied by m/s elecon engineering and these plates and pins are independently supplied by m/s. elecon engineering to be used with idler (material handling equipment). the contention of the revenue is also that the appellant failed to prove that these plates and pins can be used with industrial chains manufactured by them.5. in this case the dispute is in respect of link plates and link pins, which are cleared without industrial chains and are manufactured in accordance with specific drawing and design, supplied by the customer.these link plates and pins are used by their customers as parts of material handling equipment (idler). on a specific query from the bench whether these plates and pins can be used with the industrial chains manufactured by the appellant the reply was in negative. in these circumstances, as the link plates and link pins are manufactured are rightly classifiable alongwith the material handling equipment.6. the appellant never declared to the revenue.....

Full Judgment

2. The appellant filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) held that Link Plates and Link Pins manufactured by the appellant and cleared to M/s. Elecon Engineering Co. are classifiable Under Heading 8431.00 of the Central Excise Tariff, as parts of material handling equipment. The appellant claimed the classification Under Heading 7308.20 as part of Industrial Chains.

3. The contention of the appellant is that they are manufacturing Industrial Chains which are classifiable Under Heading 73.08 of Tariff and these Link Plates are being used as part of the Industrial Chains, therefore, are rightly classifiable alongwith the Industrial Chains.

4. The contention of the Revenue is that Link Plates and Links Pins which are manufactured as part of Industrial Chains are classifiable Under Heading 7308.02 of the Central Excise Tariff whereas the Link Plates and Link Pins, in dispute, are manufactured by them on the special design supplied by M/s Elecon Engineering and these Plates and Pins are independently supplied by M/s. Elecon Engineering to be used with Idler (material handling equipment). The contention of the Revenue is also that the appellant failed to prove that these Plates and Pins can be used with Industrial Chains manufactured by them.

5. In this case the dispute is in respect of Link Plates and Link Pins, which are cleared without Industrial Chains and are manufactured in accordance with specific drawing and design, supplied by the customer.

These Link Plates and Pins are used by their customers as parts of material handling equipment (Idler). On a specific query from the bench whether these Plates and Pins can be used with the Industrial Chains manufactured by the appellant the reply was in negative. In these circumstances, as the Link Plates and Link Pins are manufactured are rightly classifiable alongwith the material handling equipment.

6. The appellant never declared to the Revenue regarding the manufacture of above-mentioned Plates and Pins which are not similar to the Pins and Plates which are used with Industrial Chains, therefore, the extended period of limitation was rightly invoked by the lower authorities. The appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial