Xerox Modi Corp. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Xerox Modi Corp. Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 16, 2004

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/37402

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/37402
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: M T K.C.
Decided On: Dec 16, 2004
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Xerox Modi Corp. Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In: (2005)(99)ECC563

Excerpt

1. the appellants had paid central excise duty of rs. 5,07,326 under protest on pre-budget stock which was cleared from 1.3.88 to 31.7.88.subsequently, they filed a refund claim for this amount which was rejected and the amount was credited to the consumer welfare fund on the ground that the appellant have failed to negate the presumption of the unjust enrichment as provided under section 12b of the central excise act. the appeal filed by them before the commissioner (appeals) was rejected under section 11b of the act as they failed to establish that incidence of duty has not been passed on by them to anybody.2. shri ravi raghavan, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants conceded that in view of the supreme court's judgments in the case of commissioner of central excise, mumbai-ii v. allied photographics india ltd. 3. in view of this position, the appeal is dismissed as there is no merit in the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The appellants had paid central excise duty of Rs. 5,07,326 under protest on pre-budget stock which was cleared from 1.3.88 to 31.7.88.

Subsequently, they filed a refund claim for this amount which was rejected and the amount was credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground that the appellant have failed to negate the presumption of the unjust enrichment as provided under Section 12B of the Central Excise Act. The appeal filed by them before the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected under Section 11B of the Act as they failed to establish that incidence of duty has not been passed on by them to anybody.

2. Shri Ravi Raghavan, Ld. Consultant appearing for the appellants conceded that in view of the Supreme Court's judgments in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II v. Allied Photographics India Ltd. 3. In view of this position, the appeal is dismissed as there is no merit in the appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Xerox Modi Corp. Ltd. vs Cce Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M T K.C.