Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Executive Engineer, Mpseb Vs. Cce

Executive Engineer, Mpseb vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 13, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/37353

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Executive Engineer, Mpseb

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

2. appellant filed this appeal against the order in appeal passed by the commissioner (appeals). in the impugned order it is held that the fabrication by cutting and punching of holes in angles and duty paid channels transmission towers amounts to manufacture and 10% notional profit is to be added in the cost of production.3. we find that issue in respect manufacture is already covered by the decision of the tribunal in the case of additional supdt., engineer v.cce, bhopal vide final order of a/379/03-nb-c dated 16.7.2003 where the tribunal held that the activity undertaken by the appellant does not amount to manufacture. in respect of the addition of 10% profit, the hon'ble supreme court in the case of pcc pole factory v. cce-2002 (158) elt 429 held that in case of captive consumption of the goods fabricated by the electricity board which are used for lines and transmission of electric energy, the addition of 10% notional profit is not sustainable in view of the above decision of the tribunal and the hon'ble supreme court. the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

Full Judgment

2. Appellant filed this appeal against the order in appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). In the impugned order it is held that the fabrication by cutting and punching of holes in angles and duty paid channels transmission towers amounts to manufacture and 10% notional profit is to be added in the cost of production.

3. We find that issue in respect manufacture is already covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of additional Supdt., Engineer v.CCE, Bhopal vide final order of A/379/03-NB-C dated 16.7.2003 where the tribunal held that the activity undertaken by the appellant does not amount to manufacture. In respect of the addition of 10% profit, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of PCC Pole Factory v. CCE-2002 (158) ELT 429 held that in case of captive consumption of the goods fabricated by the Electricity Board which are used for lines and transmission of electric energy, the addition of 10% notional profit is not sustainable in view of the above decision of the Tribunal and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial