Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shree Shipping Services Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Airport

Shree Shipping Services vs Commissioner of Customs, Airport

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Sep 28, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/36635

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shree Shipping Services

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs, Airport

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(179)ELT284Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. this appeal is filed against the order of the commissioner (appeals) who in the impugned order confirmed the order of the lower authority.2. the appellant is a clearing agent. the allegation against him is that he allowed goods to be shipped without a let export order. the goods concerned were factory stuffed and were brought into the customs area for the purpose of export after shipping bill is passed. the appellant noticed that no permission by the customs was accorded for factory stuffing. he, therefore, requested that the goods be examined before a let export order is given. he also informed the shipping company not to put the goods on board before the customs formalities are completed. however, the steamer agent allowed the goods to be shipped. under these circumstances, the present appellant was penalised for having allowed the goods to be shipped without completing the customs formalities. from the records of the case, it is evident that the appellant has taken every precaution to see that the goods are not put on board. contrary to these instructions, it is the ship- ping company who put the goods on board and allowed the goods to be shipped.no ground has been made out to impose any penalty on the clearing agent who acted in accordance with law.

Full Judgment

1. This appeal is filed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) who in the impugned order confirmed the order of the lower authority.

2. The appellant is a clearing agent. The allegation against him is that he allowed goods to be shipped without a let export order. The goods concerned were factory stuffed and were brought into the Customs area for the purpose of export after shipping bill is passed. The appellant noticed that no permission by the Customs was accorded for factory stuffing. He, therefore, requested that the goods be examined before a let export order is given. He also informed the shipping company not to put the goods on board before the Customs formalities are completed. However, the steamer agent allowed the goods to be shipped. Under these circumstances, the present appellant was penalised for having allowed the goods to be shipped without completing the Customs formalities. From the records of the case, it is evident that the appellant has taken every precaution to see that the goods are not put on board. Contrary to these instructions, it is the ship- ping company who put the goods on board and allowed the goods to be shipped.

No ground has been made out to impose any penalty on the clearing agent who acted in accordance with law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial