Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce Vs. Voltas Ltd.

Cce vs Voltas Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 12, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/36222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce

Respondent

Voltas Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(117)LC51Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the issue involved in this appeal is the correct classification of centrifugal liquid chiller manufactured by the assessee herein, whether under chapter heading no. 84.18 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985 as claimed by the respondents or under chapter heading no. 84.15 as contended by the department. the commissioner (appeals) has accepted the stand of the assessee for classification under chapter heading no. 84.18, and hence, the revenue is in appeal against his order.2. on hearing both sides, we find that it is not disputed, that the question of classification stands decided by the tribunal order in the case of carrier aircon ltd. v. cce, delhi holding that chiller is classifiable under chapter heading 84.18 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985. there are subsequent decisions also in the case of the same assessee voltas ltd. and anr. v.cce, mumbai-vi vide order no. a/268-271/wzb/04-c-ii dated 21.5.2004 : 2004 (115) ecr 284 (t); wherein the tribunal has expressed the same view on the classification of the product.3. following the ratio of the above orders, we hold that the finding of the commissioner (appeals) on classification under heading no. 84.18 is correct and accordingly, we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The issue involved in this appeal is the correct classification of Centrifugal Liquid Chiller manufactured by the assessee herein, whether under Chapter heading No. 84.18 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as claimed by the respondents or under Chapter Heading No. 84.15 as contended by the department. The Commissioner (Appeals) has accepted the stand of the assessee for classification under Chapter Heading No. 84.18, and hence, the revenue is in appeal against his order.

2. On hearing both sides, we find that it is not disputed, that the question of classification stands decided by the Tribunal Order in the case of Carrier Aircon Ltd. v. CCE, Delhi holding that chiller is classifiable under Chapter Heading 84.18 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. There are subsequent decisions also in the case of the same assessee Voltas Ltd. and Anr. v.CCE, Mumbai-VI vide order No. A/268-271/WZB/04-C-II dated 21.5.2004 : 2004 (115) ECR 284 (T); wherein the Tribunal has expressed the same view on the classification of the product.

3. Following the ratio of the above orders, we hold that the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) on classification under Heading No. 84.18 is correct and accordingly, we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial