Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Doon Valley Distillers

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Doon Valley Distillers

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jul 15, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35948

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Doon Valley Distillers

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(171)ELT171TriDel

Excerpt

1. when the case was called none appeared on behalf of the respondent inspite of notice.2. heard ld. dr. the revenue filed this appeal against the order-in- appeal passed by the commissioner (appeals). the dispute in this case is in respect of the due date for the payment of interest. the revenue was claiming interest from the date when the service tax was due. the service tax on service of 'gto' was levied w.e.f. 16-11-97 and this levy was struck down by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of laghu udyog bharati reported in 1999 (112) e.l.t. 365. thereafter the parliament passed on revalidation act for levy of the service tax and as per the revalidation act, the tax is to be paid within 30 days of receiving of the assent of the president of india. the assent was given by the president of india as 12-6-2000. in this situation, the commissioner (appeals) held that tax is to be deposited within 30 days from the assent given by the president of india and therefore, the interest is leviable from 12-6-2000 till the date of deposition of the tax and the interest for the delayed payment. in view of the clear provision of revalidation of act, i find no infirmity in the impugned order. the appeal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the respondent inspite of notice.

2. Heard ld. DR. The Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in- appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute in this case is in respect of the due date for the payment of interest. The Revenue was claiming interest from the date when the service tax was due. The Service Tax on service of 'GTO' was levied w.e.f. 16-11-97 and this levy was struck down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Laghu Udyog Bharati reported in 1999 (112) E.L.T. 365. Thereafter the Parliament passed on revalidation Act for levy of the Service Tax and as per the revalidation Act, the tax is to be paid within 30 days of receiving of the assent of the President of India. The assent was given by the President of India as 12-6-2000. In this situation, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that tax is to be deposited within 30 days from the assent given by the President of India and therefore, the interest is leviable from 12-6-2000 till the date of deposition of the tax and the interest for the delayed payment. In view of the clear provision of revalidation of Act, I find no infirmity in the impugned order. The appeal is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial