V.i.P. Industries Ltd. Vs. Cc

V.i.P. Industries Ltd. vs Cc

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided May 21, 2004

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35340

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/35340
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: J Balasundaram, A M Moheb
Decided On: May 21, 2004
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.i.P. Industries Ltd.

Respondent

Legal References

Reported In: (2004)(95)ECC153

Excerpt

1. the benefit of project import has been denied to the appellants herein on injection moulding machine imported and cleared by them, on the ground that it was not installed in the appellants' plant at nashik in respect of which the project was registered under project import regulations, but installed at another plant of the appellants at nagpur.2. none appears for the appellants in spite of notice; hence we heard the learned sdr and perused the records.3. we find that in the case of cc, mumbai v. nrb bearing ltd., 2003 (159) elt 755, the tribunal has held that the benefit of project import is specific to unit and location as per the regulations and since the goods were found installed in a unit other than at the location approved under the contract registered, the benefit was not available.the ratio of the above order is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case, even though in this case the appellants aver that dgtd permission had been obtained for a new plant at nagpur. we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The benefit of project import has been denied to the appellants herein on injection moulding machine imported and cleared by them, on the ground that it was not installed in the appellants' plant at Nashik in respect of which the project was registered under Project Import Regulations, but installed at another plant of the appellants at Nagpur.

2. None appears for the appellants in spite of notice; hence we heard the learned SDR and perused the records.

3. We find that in the case of CC, Mumbai v. NRB Bearing Ltd., 2003 (159) ELT 755, the Tribunal has held that the benefit of project import is specific to unit and location as per the Regulations and since the goods were found installed in a unit other than at the location approved under the contract registered, the benefit was not available.

The ratio of the above order is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case, even though in this case the appellants aver that DGTD permission had been obtained for a new plant at Nagpur. We uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties V.i.P. Industries Ltd. vs Cc Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge J Balasundaram, A M Moheb