Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Bhavdu Dhondu

Emperor vs Bhavdu Dhondu

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Nov 22, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/344978

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Application for Revision No. 306 of 1912
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 476 - Civil Court-Mamlattors' Courts Act (Bombay Act II of 1906).;The Mamlatdar's Court, constituted under Bombay Act II of 19b6, is a Civil Court within the meaning of Section 476 of the Criminal; Procedure Code, 1898. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Bhavdu Dhondu

Legal References

Reported In
(1913)15BOMLR53

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 476 - civil court-mamlattors' courts act (bombay act ii of 1906).;the mamlatdar's court, constituted under bombay act ii of 19b6, is a civil court within the meaning of section 476 of the criminal; procedure code, 1898. - batchelor, j.1. this is an application by the government of bombay for revision of an interlocutory order passed by mr. varley, the sessions judge of khandesh, postponing the trial of a certain sessions case on the ground- that in the judge's opinion the commitment for trial to his court was illegal. that opinion was based upon the view that the mamlatdar's court constituted under bombay act ii of 1906 is not a civil court within the meaning of section 476, criminal procedure code. we are of opinion that there is a uniform current of decisions by this court adverse to the view which the judge below took: see, for instance, in re savanta ilr (1880) 5 bom. 137; bhagwandas v. jedu (1902) 4 bom. l.r. 970; narayan v. tukaram : (1907)9bomlr896 ; and purshottam v. mahadu : (1912)14bomlr947 . we are further of opinion that there is nothing in the provisions of the present act of 1906 to suggest that the decisions of this court, such as in re savanta, require any amendment or reconsideration. we must, therefore, set aside the order made by the sessions judge and direct him to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.

Full Judgment

Batchelor, J.

1. This is an application by the Government of Bombay for revision of an interlocutory order passed by Mr. Varley, the Sessions Judge of Khandesh, postponing the trial of a certain Sessions case on the ground- that in the Judge's opinion the commitment for trial to his Court was illegal. That opinion was based upon the view that the Mamlatdar's Court constituted under Bombay Act II of 1906 is not a civil Court within the meaning of Section 476, Criminal Procedure Code. We are of opinion that there is a uniform current of decisions by this Court adverse to the view which the Judge below took: see, for instance, In re Savanta ILR (1880) 5 Bom. 137; Bhagwandas v. Jedu (1902) 4 Bom. L.R. 970; Narayan v. Tukaram : (1907)9BOMLR896 ; and Purshottam v. Mahadu : (1912)14BOMLR947 . We are further of opinion that there is nothing in the provisions of the present Act of 1906 to suggest that the decisions of this Court, such as In re Savanta, require any amendment or reconsideration. We must, therefore, set aside the order made by the Sessions Judge and direct him to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial