Ahmed Vs. Ayeshabai

Ahmed vs Ayeshabai

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Mar 01, 1909

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/341126

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/341126
Court: Mumbai
Judge: Basil Scott, C.J. and ;Batchelor, J.
Decided On: Mar 01, 1909
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Letters Patent (Bombay), Clause 15 - Order allowing inspection of documents is not 'Judgment'--Appeal. -

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ahmed

Respondent

Ayeshabai

Legal References

Reported In: 2Ind.Cas.167

Excerpt

letters patent (bombay), clause 15 - order allowing inspection of documents is not 'judgment'--appeal. - order1. no appeal lies. appeal dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. No appeal lies. Appeal dismissed with costs.

Same Parties Ahmed vs Ayeshabai Same Subject Civil Same Judge Basil Scott, C.J. and ;Batchelor, J.

Civil