Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Arihant Cotsyn Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Arihant Cotsyn Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 22, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33885

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Arihant Cotsyn Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(167)ELT240TriDel

Excerpt

.....has also been stated that the department has filed a civil appeal with the supreme court against the tribunal's decision on similar issue in the case of cce, cochin v. southern refineries ltd. [2001 (136) e.l.t.134 (tribunal)].3. a copy of final order no. a/1383/2003-nb(sm), dated 29-10-2003 passed by this bench in the case of cce, chandigarh v. pepsi foods ltd. [appeal no. e/632/2003-nb(s)] is seen on record which shows that the appeal filed by the department against the tribunal's decision in the case of west coast industrial gases ltd. has been dismissed by the supreme court vide [2003 (155) e.l.t. 11 (s.c.)]. it is further noticed that cbec has issued another circular on 6-6-2003 in view of the supreme court's decision in west coast industrial gases ltd. this circular has clarified that "no duty shall be payable and no reversal of credit is also warranted on waste package/containers used for packing inputs, on which credit has been taken, when cleared from the factory of the manufacturer availing modvat/cenvat credit." 4. the question whether duty of excise is payable on used containers of modvatable inputs stands settled as above, against the revenue. the present appeal of the revenue is, therefore, devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. This appeal of the Revenue is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the Department's appeal against the order of the original authority vacating a demand raised against the assessee in respect of used (empty) containers of modvatable inputs. The original authority had relied on the Board's Circular No. 449/15/99-CX., dated 23-3-99. The appeal preferred by the Department against the decision of the original authority was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by relying on the said circular as well as the Tribunal's judgment in the case of West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. [1999 (108) E.L.T. 383]. Hence the present appeal of the Revenue.

2. No representation for the respondents despite notice. The DR reiterates the grounds of this appeal. One of the grounds is that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted the department's appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the case of West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. It has also been stated that the Department has filed a Civil Appeal with the Supreme Court against the Tribunal's decision on similar issue in the case of CCE, Cochin v. Southern Refineries Ltd. [2001 (136) E.L.T.134 (Tribunal)].

3. A copy of Final Order No. A/1383/2003-NB(SM), dated 29-10-2003 passed by this Bench in the case of CCE, Chandigarh v. Pepsi Foods Ltd. [Appeal No. E/632/2003-NB(S)] is seen on record which shows that the appeal filed by the department against the Tribunal's decision in the case of West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. has been dismissed by the Supreme Court vide [2003 (155) E.L.T. 11 (S.C.)]. It is further noticed that CBEC has issued another Circular on 6-6-2003 in view of the Supreme Court's decision in West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. This circular has clarified that "no duty shall be payable and no reversal of credit is also warranted on waste package/containers used for packing inputs, on which credit has been taken, when cleared from the factory of the manufacturer availing Modvat/Cenvat credit." 4. The question whether duty of excise is payable on used containers of modvatable inputs stands settled as above, against the Revenue. The present appeal of the Revenue is, therefore, devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial