Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Stylo Pack

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Stylo Pack

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jan 07, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33689

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Stylo Pack

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(167)ELT102Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. revenue is in appeal against the order of the commissioner of central excise (appeals) having held that after availing modvat credit the goods do not loose their duty paid character, therefore the waste would be arising from such inputs are not intermediate goods and the contents of notification no. 14/92, dated 1-3-92 are satisfied. (i) waste arises during manufacture process from lay flat tubes which were except under notification no. 217/86, which are intermediate goods and not inputs. (ii) inputs loose the duty paid character ones the credit has been availed.3. the commissioner has relied upon tribunal decision in the case of metrosyl, jesidih industrial area [1991 (53) e.l.t. 93] to arrive at his conclusion that inputs do not loose duty paid character after availment of modvat credit and had the intention be otherwise, the notification would have stipulated 'no credit availed on inputs' and valued has to be interpreted strictly. no contrary decision has been shown to us. therefore, no merits are found in the grounds taken to upset the commissioner findings.

Full Judgment

1. Revenue is in appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) having held that after availing Modvat credit the goods do not loose their duty paid character, therefore the waste would be arising from such inputs are not intermediate goods and the contents of Notification No. 14/92, dated 1-3-92 are satisfied.

(i) Waste arises during manufacture process from lay flat tubes which were except under Notification No. 217/86, which are intermediate goods and not inputs.

(ii) Inputs loose the duty paid character ones the credit has been availed.

3. The Commissioner has relied upon Tribunal decision in the case of Metrosyl, Jesidih Industrial Area [1991 (53) E.L.T. 93] to arrive at his conclusion that inputs do not loose duty paid character after availment of Modvat credit and had the intention be otherwise, the notification would have stipulated 'no credit availed on inputs' and valued has to be interpreted strictly. No contrary decision has been shown to us. Therefore, no merits are found in the grounds taken to upset the Commissioner findings.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial