Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Prerna Textile Industries Pvt.

Commissioner of Customs and vs Prerna Textile Industries Pvt.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jan 01, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33628

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Customs and

Respondent

Prerna Textile Industries Pvt.

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(93)ECC39

Excerpt

1. the issue is dispute involved in the present appeal filed by the revenue, namely, whether installation, erection and commissioning charges including travelling expenses and out of pocket expenses are includable in the assessable value of textile machinery manufactured by the respondents herein stands settled in favour of the assessees by the apex court decision in the case of thermax limited v. cce, 1998 (99) elt 481 (sc) wherein the apex court has held that the charges for installation, erection and commissioning of equipment installed at customer's premises is not includable in the assessable value of such equipment, 2. following the ratio of the above order we see no ground for interference with the impugned order of the commissioner (appeals) and accordingly uphold the same and dismiss the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The issue is dispute involved in the present appeal filed by the Revenue, namely, whether installation, erection and commissioning charges including travelling expenses and out of pocket expenses are includable in the assessable value of textile machinery manufactured by the respondents herein stands settled in favour of the assessees by the Apex Court decision in the case of Thermax Limited v. CCE, 1998 (99) ELT 481 (SC) wherein the Apex Court has held that the charges for installation, erection and commissioning of equipment installed at customer's premises is not includable in the assessable value of such equipment, 2. Following the ratio of the above order we see no ground for interference with the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and accordingly uphold the same and dismiss the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial