Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Ramjan Dadubhai

Emperor vs Ramjan Dadubhai

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Aug 19, 1915
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/335688

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Review No. 1 of 1915
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 562-First offenders-Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 420.;Section 562 of the Criminal Procedure Code is not applicable to convictions of cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of property under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. - - 100 each to k...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Ramjan Dadubhai

Legal References

Reported In
(1915)17BOMLR921

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 562-first offenders-penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 420.;section 562 of the criminal procedure code is not applicable to convictions of cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of property under section 420 of the indian penal code. - - 100 each to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for six months.1. in this case the two accused were convicted by the first class city magistrate of sholapur, mr. poredi, under sections 420 and 471 of the indian penal code. by way of punishment the accused were merely directed to be released on their entering into bonds for rs. 50 and one surety for rs. 100 each to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for six months. that order was made under section 562 of the criminal procedure code. the conviction was had in october 1914, so that the bonds executed have now expired. in these circumstances, we think it unnecessary to pursue these proceedings further. but it should be pointed out to the learned magistrate for his future guidance that section 562 is not in terms applicable to convictions of cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of property under section 420 or of using as genuine a forged document under section 471 of the indian penal code.2. with these observations the papers should be returned, the rule being discharged.

Full Judgment

1. In this case the two accused were convicted by the First Class City Magistrate of Sholapur, Mr. Poredi, under Sections 420 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. By way of punishment the accused were merely directed to be released on their entering into bonds for Rs. 50 and one surety for Rs. 100 each to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for six months. That order was made under Section 562 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The conviction was had in October 1914, so that the bonds executed have now expired. In these circumstances, we think it unnecessary to pursue these proceedings further. But it should be pointed out to the learned Magistrate for his future guidance that Section 562 is not in terms applicable to convictions of cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of property under Section 420 or of using as genuine a forged document under Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. With these observations the papers should be returned, the rule being discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial