Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Associated Cement Companies Vs. Cce

Associated Cement Companies vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Decided Dec 15, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33454

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Associated Cement Companies

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(114)LC975Tri(Bang.)alore

Excerpt

1. these are two appeals filed by the applicants involving common issue and therefore, they are taken together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. the short point to be considered in this case is whether ready concrete mixture is classifiable under chapter heading 68.07 as claimed by the assessee or under chapter heading 38.23 as per the department.3. it was submitted by the counsel that the issue involved in this case has been decided by the tribunal in the very party's case (associated cement co. ltd. v. cce, mumbai as reported in 2001 (138) elt 911) : 2001 (96) ecr 176 (t) and the same has been upheld by the supreme court while dismissing the appeals as in appeal nos. 2618-2619/2001. it was also submitted by the counsel that this bench has also followed the earlier decision of the tribunal (mumbai) and held that the item in question falls under chapter heading 68.07 upto 31.3.1997. it was also submitted that since the item has been classified under chapter heading 68.07, the party is entitled to the benefit of notification no.36/94.4. following the ratio of the earlier decision, we accept the plea of the party and accordingly, these two appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any.

Full Judgment

1. These are two appeals filed by the applicants involving common issue and therefore, they are taken together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The short point to be considered in this case is whether Ready Concrete Mixture is classifiable under Chapter Heading 68.07 as claimed by the assessee or under Chapter Heading 38.23 as per the Department.

3. It was submitted by the Counsel that the issue involved in this case has been decided by the Tribunal in the very party's case (Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai as reported in 2001 (138) ELT 911) : 2001 (96) ECR 176 (T) and the same has been upheld by the Supreme Court while dismissing the appeals as in appeal Nos. 2618-2619/2001. It was also submitted by the Counsel that this Bench has also followed the earlier decision of the Tribunal (Mumbai) and held that the item in question falls under Chapter Heading 68.07 upto 31.3.1997. It was also submitted that since the item has been classified under Chapter Heading 68.07, the party is entitled to the benefit of Notification No.36/94.

4. Following the ratio of the earlier decision, we accept the plea of the party and accordingly, these two appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial