Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Customs Vs. D.K. Group of Industries

Commissioner of Customs vs D.K. Group of Industries

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 12, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33418

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Customs

Respondent

D.K. Group of Industries

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(166)ELT350TriDel

Excerpt

1. this is an appeal filed by the department against order-in-appeal no. 6/cus/jal/2003, dated 24-6-2003 passed by the commissioner of customs and central excise (appeals), jalandhar. the appellant is represented by the dr, shri s.c. pushkarna. the respondent is not present, nor represented. it appears that they want a decision on merits without being personally heard.2. ld. dr submits that the commissioner (appeals), jalandhar had no jurisdiction in the matter which relates to customs (preventive), amritsar. in support of this submission, ld. dr refers to notification no. 16/2002-cus. (n.t.), dated 7-3-2002 as amended by notification no.78/2002-cus. (n.t.), dated 5-12-2002.3. i have perused both the cited notifications and find that, w.e.f 5-12-2002 the commissioner of customs (appeals), jalandhar has no jurisdiction over matters falling within the jurisdiction of commissioner of customs (preventive), amritsar and that such matters are appealable only to commissioner of customs (appeals), delhi-i. the impugned order passed, without jurisdiction, by the commissioner (appeals), jalandhar is set aside and the present appeal is allowed.4. it appears from the record that the party had filed appeal with the commissioner (appeals), jalandhar before amendment of the relevant entries in the table to notification no. 16/2002-cus. (n.t.), by notification no. 78/2002-cus (nt). at that time, the commissioner (appeals), jalandhar had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. since the subsequent amendment of notification no. 16/2002 can in no way prejudice the interest of the assessee, there shall be a direction to the commissioner (appeals), jalandhar to transmit the assessee's appeal and all papers connected therewith expeditiously to the commissioner (appeals), delhi-i.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal filed by the department against Order-in-Appeal No. 6/Cus/Jal/2003, dated 24-6-2003 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Jalandhar. The appellant is represented by the DR, Shri S.C. Pushkarna. The respondent is not present, nor represented. It appears that they want a decision on merits without being personally heard.

2. Ld. DR submits that the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar had no jurisdiction in the matter which relates to Customs (Preventive), Amritsar. In support of this submission, ld. DR refers to Notification No. 16/2002-Cus. (N.T.), dated 7-3-2002 as amended by Notification No.78/2002-Cus. (N.T.), dated 5-12-2002.

3. I have perused both the cited notifications and find that, w.e.f 5-12-2002 the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar has no jurisdiction over matters falling within the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Amritsar and that such matters are appealable only to Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I. The impugned order passed, without jurisdiction, by the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar is set aside and the present appeal is allowed.

4. It appears from the record that the party had filed appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar before amendment of the relevant entries in the Table to Notification No. 16/2002-Cus. (N.T.), by Notification No. 78/2002-Cus (NT). At that time, the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Since the subsequent amendment of Notification No. 16/2002 can in no way prejudice the interest of the assessee, there shall be a direction to the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar to transmit the assessee's appeal and all papers connected therewith expeditiously to the Commissioner (Appeals), Delhi-I.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial