Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cenlub Systems Vs. Cce

Cenlub Systems vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 10, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33373

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cenlub Systems

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

1. the issue raised in this appeal at the instance of the assessee is whether installation charges received by it are liable to be included in the assesseeable value of the parts of the machinery cleared by it from its factory. reliance was placed by the appellant on the decision of the supreme court in triveni engg. works ltd. vs. cce, 2002-taxindiaonline-14-sc-cx. the commissioner (appeals) observing that ratio in triveni engg. works ltd. is not applicable to the appellant's case, upheld the demand. we fail to understand as to how the commissioner (appeals) has come to such a conclusion. he does not give any reason to hold that triveni engg. works ltd. is not applicable to the facts of the case. according to us, ratio of the decision of the supreme court is directly applicable to the appellant's case. we, therefore, set aside the order impugned and allow the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The issue raised in this appeal at the instance of the assessee is whether installation charges received by it are liable to be included in the assesseeable value of the parts of the machinery cleared by it from its factory. Reliance was placed by the appellant on the decision of the Supreme Court in Triveni Engg. Works Ltd. Vs. CCE, 2002-Taxindiaonline-14-SC-CX. The Commissioner (Appeals) observing that ratio in Triveni Engg. Works Ltd. is not applicable to the appellant's case, upheld the demand. We fail to understand as to how the Commissioner (Appeals) has come to such a conclusion. He does not give any reason to hold that Triveni Engg. Works Ltd. is not applicable to the facts of the case. According to us, ratio of the decision of the Supreme court is directly applicable to the appellant's case. We, therefore, set aside the order impugned and allow the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial