Ronak Dyeing Ltd. Vs. Cce

Ronak Dyeing Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Dec 08, 2003

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/33339
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
Decided On: Dec 08, 2003
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ronak Dyeing Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In: (2004)(112)LC652Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. it is seen that the appeal was disposed of by a bench of two members under order no. c-ii/251/wz13/2003 dt. 15.2.2003. misc. application is filed without referring to the disposal of the appeal but praying for extension of stay as if the appeal is pending. unfortunately, this mistake was not brought to the notice of the bench which referred the issue by the dr also. under these circumstances, the reference was made in a case when the appeal itself was not pending. we, therefore, send back the matter to the bench which referred the issue for passing appropriate orders on the misc. application.

Full Judgment

1. It is seen that the appeal was disposed of by a Bench of two Members under order No. C-II/251/WZ13/2003 dt. 15.2.2003. Misc. application is filed without referring to the disposal of the appeal but praying for extension of stay as if the appeal is pending. Unfortunately, this mistake was not brought to the notice of the Bench which referred the issue by the DR also. Under these circumstances, the reference was made in a case when the appeal itself was not pending. We, therefore, send back the matter to the Bench which referred the issue for passing appropriate orders on the misc. application.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Ronak Dyeing Ltd. vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.