Malhari Vs. Narso Krishna

Malhari vs Narso Krishna

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Nov 28, 1884

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/331333

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/331333
Court: Mumbai
Judge: Charles Sargent, C.J. and ;Kemball, J.
Decided On: Nov 28, 1884
Subject: Civil;Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code Act XIV of 1882, Section 295 - Decree passed by Sub ordinate Judge--Decree by same Court in exercise of its Small Cause jurisdiction--Sale--Rateabledistribution of assets. -

Key legal issue: Civil;Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Malhari

Respondent

Narso Krishna

Legal References

Reported In: (1885)ILR9Bom174

Excerpt

civil procedure code act xiv of 1882, section 295 - decree passed by sub ordinate judge--decree by same court in exercise of its small cause jurisdiction--sale--rateabledistribution of assets. - kemball, j.1. although a subordinate judge invested under act x of 1869, section 28, with a small cause powers acquires the jurisdiction of two courts, he does not become the judge of two courts, but remains the judge of a subordinate court.

Full Judgment

Kemball, J.

1. Although a Subordinate Judge invested under Act X of 1869, Section 28, with a Small Cause powers acquires the jurisdiction of two Courts, he does not become the Judge of two Courts, but remains the Judge of a Subordinate Court.

Same Parties Malhari vs Narso Krishna Same Subject Civil;Property Same Judge Charles Sargent, C.J. and ;Kemball, J.

Civil;Property