Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pankaj Jagda Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Pankaj Jagda vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Nov 11, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/33012

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pankaj Jagda

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(171)ELT125Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. vide final order nos. c-1/2874 and 2875/wzb/2001, dated 19-9-2001, [2002 (140) e.l.t. 225 (tribunal)] the tribunal, while upholding confiscation of currency belonging to the applicants herein, permitted redemption of the currency on payment of a fine of rs. 8 lakhs. the department issued a refund order of rs. 20,11,403/- on the basis that the indian equivalent currency was rs. 28/01/257/-, the applicants contend that what should have been refunded to them was rs. 37,87,694/- less rs. 8 lakhs, which is the equivalent value of the seized currency as on the date of the final order of the tribunal dated 19-9-2001 and rely upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of philips fernandes v. cc, mumbai (final order no. c-i/2781/wzb/2002, dated 11-9-2002) wherein the equivalent currency as on the date of the tribunal's order was directed to be paid.2. the matter was adjourned to see whether in the case of philips fernandes what was refunded was the indian equivalent currency as on the date of the tribunal's order. the learned dr produces copy of a letter addressed to the deputy commissioner of customs, airport, mumbai, saying that the commissioner had executed the order in the case of philips fernandes, paying him the indian equivalent currency as on the date of the tribunal's order, viz. 11-9-2002. we, therefore, direct that in this case also the applicants should be refunded the balance of the indian equivalent as on the date of the tribunal's order, viz.19-9-2001. the amount shall be refunded within a period of one month from today.

Full Judgment

1. Vide Final Order Nos. C-1/2874 and 2875/WZB/2001, dated 19-9-2001, [2002 (140) E.L.T. 225 (Tribunal)] the Tribunal, while upholding confiscation of currency belonging to the applicants herein, permitted redemption of the currency on payment of a fine of Rs. 8 lakhs. The department issued a refund order of Rs. 20,11,403/- on the basis that the Indian equivalent currency was Rs. 28/01/257/-, The applicants contend that what should have been refunded to them was Rs. 37,87,694/- less Rs. 8 lakhs, which is the equivalent value of the seized currency as on the date of the final order of the Tribunal dated 19-9-2001 and rely upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Philips Fernandes v. CC, Mumbai (Final Order No. C-I/2781/WZB/2002, dated 11-9-2002) wherein the equivalent currency as on the date of the Tribunal's order was directed to be paid.

2. The matter was adjourned to see whether in the case of Philips Fernandes what was refunded was the Indian equivalent currency as on the date of the Tribunal's order. The learned DR produces copy of a letter addressed to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Airport, Mumbai, saying that the Commissioner had executed the order in the case of Philips Fernandes, paying him the Indian equivalent currency as on the date of the Tribunal's order, viz. 11-9-2002. We, therefore, direct that in this case also the applicants should be refunded the balance of the Indian equivalent as on the date of the Tribunal's order, viz.

19-9-2001. The amount shall be refunded within a period of one month from today.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial