Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hodge Vs. Marsh

Hodge vs Marsh

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Mar 02, 1936
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/329818

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Privy Council - Practice-Appeal-Abatement-Death of respondent before hearing of appeal unknown to Privy Council-Appeal heard-Respondent not represented--Judgment reserved cannot be delivered after respondent's death.;Where the respondent, in an appeal to the Privy Council from an order making absolute a decree nisi ...

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hodge

Respondent

Marsh

Legal References

Reported In
(1936)38BOMLR680

Excerpt

privy council - practice-appeal-abatement-death of respondent before hearing of appeal unknown to privy council-appeal heard-respondent not represented--judgment reserved cannot be delivered after respondent's death.;where the respondent, in an appeal to the privy council from an order making absolute a decree nisi in a suit for divorce, died two days before the hearing of the appeal, at which the respondent did not appear nor was he represented, the appeal being argued in ignorance of the fact of his death, and the board reserved judgment :-;that the appeal at the moment of the death of the respondent and the judicial committee were disabled from delivering the reserved judgment. - section 31(4) (since repealed) :[tarun chatterjee & h.l.dattu, jj] jurisdiction of high court - respondent, a government company, chartered appellants vessel to carry rock phosphate from togo to west coast india - dispute arose between parties - under agreement, respondent had chosen mumbai as port of delivery vessel carrying rock phosphate was delivered at port of bombay - application filed by respondent earlier before delhi high court for appointment of certain individual as arbitrator had become infructuous because of his demise held, high court of bombay, is not correct in rejecting arbitration petition filed by appellant on ground of lack of jurisdiction. alness, j.1. said that in the circumstances the board were disabled from delivering judgment as the appeal abated at the moment of the death of the respondent.

Full Judgment

Alness, J.

1. Said that in the circumstances the Board were disabled from delivering judgment as the appeal abated at the moment of the death of the respondent.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial