Empress Vs. Arjun

.....court in para 36 of judgment in the case of state v millind reported in 2001 91) mah. lj sc 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india. said observations/directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to appointments and are restricted to the cases relating to admissions. the protection, if any, to be granted in the fact and circumstances of case would depend upon exercise of discretion by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution. said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court. hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions. - the accused did not merely falsely inform the chief constable that he had been fobbed, but he complained that ganpat had robbed him.pinhey, j.1. we must reverse the conviction and sentence, and direct the trial of the accused for an offence punishable under section 211 of the indian penal code. the accused did not merely falsely inform the chief constable that he had been fobbed, but he complained that ganpat had robbed him.