Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Reference by the Sessions Judge of Surat

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Feb 12, 1885
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/328766

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Joint Judges - Criminal Procedure Code Act X of 1882, Section 193, Clause 2--Applications under Chapter XXXII--Sessions Judge, power of, to direct disposal, by Joint Sessions Judge, of such applications as cases transferred. - MAHARASHTRA SCHEDULED CASTES, SCHEDULED TRIBES, DE-NOTIFIED TRIBES (VIMUKTA JATIS), NOMADI...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Reference by the Sessions Judge of Surat

Legal References

Reported In
(1885)ILR9Bom352

Excerpt

joint judges - criminal procedure code act x of 1882, section 193, clause 2--applications under chapter xxxii--sessions judge, power of, to direct disposal, by joint sessions judge, of such applications as cases transferred. - maharashtra scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act (23 of 2001), sections 6 & 10: [s.b. mhase, a.p. deshpande & p.b. varale, jj] caste certificate petitioner seeking appointment against the post reserved for member of schedule tribe his caste certificate was invalidated subsequently held, his appointment would not be protected. the observations/directions issued by supreme court in para 36 of judgment in the case of state v millind reported in 2001 91) mah. lj sc 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india. said observations/directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to appointments and are restricted to the cases relating to admissions. the protection, if any, to be granted in the fact and circumstances of case would depend upon exercise of discretion by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution. said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court. hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions. nanabhai haridas, j.1. if the applications mentioned in paragraph 2 of the acting sessions judge's letter (no. 187) of 27th january, 1885, be applications for the exercise of the sessions judge's power under chapter xxxii of the criminal procedure code (act x of 1882), we think mr. thakur's view of the law to be correct. section 193, clause 2, refers only to cases which, are to be made over to the joint sessions judge for trial,

Full Judgment

Nanabhai Haridas, J.

1. If the applications mentioned in paragraph 2 of the Acting Sessions Judge's letter (No. 187) of 27th January, 1885, be applications for the exercise of the Sessions Judge's power under Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1882), we think Mr. Thakur's view of the law to be correct. Section 193, Clause 2, refers only to cases which, are to be made over to the Joint Sessions Judge for trial,

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial