Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mangal Singh Vs. the King

Mangal Singh vs The King

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Jan 18, 1937
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/328128

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Judicial Committee Rules, 1925, Rule 81-Conviction of murder-Petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis-Legal aid-Expenses-Fees of appellant's counsel and solicitors.;Rule 81 of the Judicial Committee Rules, 1925, provides as follows :-'Where the Judicial Committee directs costs to be taxed on the pauper scale, ...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mangal Singh

Respondent

The King

Legal References

Reported In
(1937)39BOMLR712

Excerpt

.....tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act (23 of 2001), sections 6 & 10: [s.b. mhase, a.p. deshpande & p.b. varale, jj] caste certificate petitioner seeking appointment against the post reserved for member of schedule tribe his caste certificate was invalidated subsequently held, his appointment would not be protected. the observations/directions issued by supreme court in para 36 of judgment in the case of state v millind reported in 2001 91) mah. lj sc 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india. said observations/directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to appointments and are restricted to the cases relating to admissions. the protection, if any, to be granted in the fact and circumstances of case would depend upon exercise of discretion by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution. said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court. hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions. - he is seeking to have the best of both worlds.thankerton, j.1. [after referring to the provisions of rule 81 of the judicial committee rules, 1925, his lordship continued :] counsel for the petitioner appears to be flying straight in the teeth of the rule. the proposal is a novel one to me, or, at least, a most unusual one. i fear that it is not competent. the petitioner is asking for indulgence to appeal as a pauper, and yet wishes to employ counsel at someone else's expense. he is seeking to have the best of both worlds.2. with regard to the legal aid provided to prisoners by the court of criminal appeal in this country, there is statutory provision for it. the petitioner is asking for an order which this board cannot possibly pronounce.3. with the exception of the point with regard to the fees of counsel and solicitor, the petition will be granted.

Full Judgment

Thankerton, J.

1. [After referring to the provisions of Rule 81 of the Judicial Committee Rules, 1925, his Lordship continued :] Counsel for the petitioner appears to be flying straight in the teeth of the rule. The proposal is a novel one to me, or, at least, a most unusual one. I fear that it is not competent. The petitioner is asking for indulgence to appeal as a pauper, and yet wishes to employ counsel at someone else's expense. He is seeking to have the best of both worlds.

2. With regard to the legal aid provided to prisoners by the Court of Criminal Appeal in this country, there is statutory provision for it. The petitioner is asking for an order which this Board cannot possibly pronounce.

3. With the exception of the point with regard to the fees of counsel and solicitor, the petition will be granted.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial