Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ganesh Agro Steel Industries and

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Ganesh Agro Steel Industries and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Oct 24, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/32791

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Ganesh Agro Steel Industries and

Excerpt

1. the issue in dispute in the present appeals filed by the revenue against a common order of the commissioner of central excise (appeals), pune, is the admissibility of deemed credit under ministry of finance's order no. ts/36/94-tru dated 1.3.1994 even after crossing of the ceiling limit of rs. 75 lakhs in terms of notification 1/93 relating to small scale units, by the respondents herein who are manufacturers of mild steel ctd bars/m.s. round bars etc., although their specific clearances were within the limit of rs. 2 crores.2. the respondents' counsel has sought for an adjournment of the appeals against m/s. ganesh agro steel industries, m/s, shiva steel rolling mills and m/s. ajanta re-rolling mills pvt. ltd.; however we find that the issue is covered by a larger bench decision and hence we do not consider it necessary to grant adjournment.3. we find that the commissioner (appeals) has relied upon the tribunal's order in the case of cce, vs. venkateshwara steel industries 1996 (86) elt 446 wherein it has been held that a ssi unit continues to be so even after it crossed rs.75 lakhs turnover in a financial year, provided it satisfies the criterion set out in ssi notification 1/93 and that deemed credit order dated 1.3.1994 continues to be admissible to the ssi unit even after crossing the exemption slab of rs.75 lakhs when the unit stalls paying duty at full rate. this decision has been subsequently overruled by the larger bench in the case of digambar foundary vs. cce, allahabad 2000 (118) elt 85 wherein it has been held that re-rollers, whose aggregate value of clearances in a financial year exceed rs.75 lakhs, are not eligible to the benefit of deemed credit in view of the order dated 1.3.1994.4. following the larger bench decision cited supra, we hold that the benefit of the deemed credit is not admissible to the respondents, set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals.

Full Judgment

1. The issue in dispute in the present appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune, is the admissibility of deemed credit under Ministry of Finance's Order No. TS/36/94-TRU dated 1.3.1994 even after crossing of the ceiling limit of Rs. 75 lakhs in terms of notification 1/93 relating to small scale units, by the respondents herein who are manufacturers of mild steel CTD bars/M.S. round bars etc., although their specific clearances were within the limit of Rs. 2 crores.

2. The respondents' counsel has sought for an adjournment of the appeals against M/s. Ganesh Agro Steel Industries, M/s, Shiva Steel Rolling Mills and M/s. Ajanta Re-rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.; however we find that the issue is covered by a larger bench decision and hence we do not consider it necessary to grant adjournment.

3. We find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has relied upon the Tribunal's order in the case of CCE, vs. Venkateshwara Steel Industries 1996 (86) ELT 446 wherein it has been held that a SSI unit continues to be so even after it crossed Rs.75 lakhs turnover in a financial year, provided it satisfies the criterion set out in SSI notification 1/93 and that Deemed Credit Order dated 1.3.1994 continues to be admissible to the SSI unit even after crossing the exemption slab of Rs.75 lakhs when the unit stalls paying duty at full rate. This decision has been subsequently overruled by the larger bench in the case of Digambar Foundary vs. CCE, Allahabad 2000 (118) ELT 85 wherein it has been held that re-rollers, whose aggregate value of clearances in a financial year exceed Rs.75 lakhs, are not eligible to the benefit of deemed credit in view of the order dated 1.3.1994.

4. Following the larger bench decision cited supra, we hold that the benefit of the deemed credit is not admissible to the respondents, set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial