Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Dwarka Poonja

Emperor vs Dwarka Poonja

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Jan 11, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/327127

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
(sic) Revision No. 361 of 1911
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 309-Suicide--Attempt-Leaping into a well to avoid police torture.;The accused jumped into a well to avoid and escape from the Police; and when rescued he came out of the well of his own accord :-;That in absence of evidence that he jumped into the well to commit suicide, he coul...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Dwarka Poonja

Legal References

Reported In
(1912)14BOMLR146

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 309-suicide--attempt-leaping into a well to avoid police torture.;the accused jumped into a well to avoid and escape from the police; and when rescued he came out of the well of his own accord :-;that in absence of evidence that he jumped into the well to commit suicide, he could not be convicted of an offence under section 3o9 of the indian penal code. - - order 1. there is no evidence that the accused jumped into the well to commit suicide; the evidence shows that he came out of the well of his own accord.order1. there is no evidence that the accused jumped into the well to commit suicide; his own version is that he jumped just to avoid and escape from the police. the evidence shows that he came out of the well of his own accord. the court therefore/quashes the conviction recorded against and sentence passed upon the accused dwarka poonja.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. There is no evidence that the accused jumped into the well to commit suicide; his own version is that he jumped just to avoid and escape from the Police. The evidence shows that he came out of the well of his own accord. The Court therefore/quashes the conviction recorded against and sentence passed upon the accused Dwarka Poonja.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial