Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce Vs. Rockwool Industries

Cce vs Rockwool Industries

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Aug 28, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/31993

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce

Respondent

Rockwool Industries

Excerpt

2. revenue filed these appeals against the order in appeal passed by the commissioner (appeals) whereby the rockwool manufactured by the respondents are held to be classifiable under heading 6807.00 of central excise tariff.3. we find that issue is in respect of classification of rockwool is decided by the tribunal vide final order no. 204/2002-d dated 22.8.2002 : 2002 (105) ecr 916 (t) in the case of m/s. minwool rock fibres ltd., rajnandgaon. the tribunal in this case held that the correct classification of the goods in which more than 25% by weight of red mud, press mud or blast furnace slag or one or more of these material is present under heading 6807.10 of central excise tariff. the issue involved in these appeals is covered by the above decision of the tribunal. therefore, we find no merit in the appeals. both the appeals are rejected.

Full Judgment

2. Revenue filed these appeals against the order in appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Rockwool manufactured by the respondents are held to be classifiable under Heading 6807.00 of Central Excise Tariff.

3. We find that issue is in respect of Classification of Rockwool is decided by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. 204/2002-D dated 22.8.2002 : 2002 (105) ECR 916 (T) in the case of M/s. Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd., Rajnandgaon. The Tribunal in this case held that the correct classification of the goods in which more than 25% by weight of red mud, press mud or Blast Furnace Slag or one or more of these material is present under Heading 6807.10 of Central Excise Tariff. The issue involved in these appeals is covered by the above decision of the Tribunal. Therefore, we find no merit in the appeals. Both the appeals are rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial