Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vitan Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Vitan Kumar vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 06, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/31127

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vitan Kumar

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(156)ELT1009TriDel

Excerpt

1. this application for restoration of the appeal is by the appel-lant's advocate. this is not enough. an application for restoration of an appeal should be filed by the appellant himself. if the ground for restoration of the appeal is something personally pertaining to the counsel, the application should be accompanied by an affidavit of the advocate. the present application is rejected, with liberty to the appellant to file proper application as required by law.

Full Judgment

1. This application for restoration of the appeal is by the appel-lant's Advocate. This is not enough. An application for restoration of an appeal should be filed by the appellant himself. If the ground for restoration of the appeal is something personally pertaining to the Counsel, the application should be accompanied by an affidavit of the Advocate. The present application is rejected, with liberty to the appellant to file proper application as required by law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial