Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Design Point Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Ep), Air

The Design Point vs Commissioner of Customs (Ep), Air

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 29, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/30731

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Design Point

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs (Ep), Air

Excerpt

1. the application for early hearing of above appeal is allowed in view of the submission made before us by the applicant/respondent that even in respect of consignments already exported for identical goods claimed to be printed books, the revenue is refused the depb benefit and in view of the submission that non-allowance of depb is causing financial hardship to the applicant.

Full Judgment

1. The application for early hearing of above appeal is allowed in view of the submission made before us by the applicant/respondent that even in respect of consignments already exported for identical goods claimed to be printed books, the Revenue is refused the DEPB benefit and in view of the submission that non-allowance of DEPB is causing financial hardship to the applicant.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial