Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Manish Engineering Corporation

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Manish Engineering Corporation

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Nov 18, 2002
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/29382

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Respondent

Manish Engineering Corporation

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(162)ELT670Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. no one is present for the respondent. shri m.h. shaikh, learned j.d.r. is present on behalf of the revenue. he has submitted that the credit has been availed on invalid documents, which is not admissible.the learned commissioner (appeals) has clearly stated in his order that the appellant has rectified the deficiency pointed out in the show cause notice.the deficiencies are such which are of procedural nature and on rectification the documents become valid for availing the credit. the deficiencies pointed out are such which will not have any adverse effect on the duty paying character of the goods. on rectification, the invoices as is evident from the copies enclosed to the appeal, have all been defaced by the proper officer.2. after hearing the learned j.d.r. and perusal of the records, i do not find any reasons to interfere with the order passed by the learned commissioner (appeals). the appeal filed by the revenue is accordingly dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. No one is present for the respondent. Shri M.H. Shaikh, learned J.D.R. is present on behalf of the Revenue. He has submitted that the credit has been availed on invalid documents, which is not admissible.

The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has clearly stated in his order that the appellant has rectified the deficiency pointed out in the Show Cause Notice.The deficiencies are such which are of procedural nature and on rectification the documents become valid for availing the credit. The deficiencies pointed out are such which will not have any adverse effect on the duty paying character of the goods. On rectification, the invoices as is evident from the copies enclosed to the appeal, have all been defaced by the proper officer.

2. After hearing the learned J.D.R. and perusal of the records, I do not find any reasons to interfere with the order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal filed by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial