G.S. Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

G.S. Impex vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 03, 2002

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/29030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/29030
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: K Usha, B T K.K.
Decided On: Oct 03, 2002
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G.S. Impex

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In: (2003)(153)ELT662TriDel

Excerpt

1. when the stay application was called, it was agreed by both the sides that the appeal itself can be disposed of. therefore, we waive the condition of pre-deposit and proceed with the appeal.2. this appeal is against the order passed by the commissioner (appeals) dated 29-5-2002. on going through the orders passed by the original authority and appellate authority, we find that the declared value of the goods imported was rejected and assessment was made on the basis of results obtained on the alleged market enquiry. neither the original order nor the appellate order would give any data regarding the market enquiry. it is the case of the appellant that the authorities have not made available to it details regarding the alleged market enquiry. in these circumstances, we find that the impugned order is not sustainable under the law and as a result, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. When the Stay Application was called, it was agreed by both the sides that the appeal itself can be disposed of. Therefore, we waive the condition of pre-deposit and proceed with the appeal.

2. This appeal is against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 29-5-2002. On going through the orders passed by the Original Authority and Appellate Authority, we find that the declared value of the goods imported was rejected and assessment was made on the basis of results obtained on the alleged market enquiry. Neither the original order nor the appellate order would give any data regarding the market enquiry. It is the case of the appellant that the authorities have not made available to it details regarding the alleged market enquiry. In these circumstances, we find that the impugned order is not sustainable under the law and as a result, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties G.S. Impex vs Commissioner of Customs Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge K Usha, B T K.K.