Videocon Narmada Electronics Vs. Cce and Cus.

Videocon Narmada Electronics vs Cce and Cus.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 28, 2002

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/28806

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/28806
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: J Balasundaram, J T J.H.
Decided On: Aug 28, 2002
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Videocon Narmada Electronics

Respondent

Cce and Cus.

Legal References

Reported In: (2006)STR321

Excerpt

1. delay of 60 days in filing the above appeal is condoned in view of the statement that in order to determine the service tax liability as per the impugned order, it was necessary for the applicant to call for details from various transport operators of over india and this took about 1 1/2 months, thus occasioning the delay.

Full Judgment

1. Delay of 60 days in filing the above appeal is condoned in view of the statement that in order to determine the Service Tax Liability as per the impugned order, it was necessary for the applicant to call for details from various Transport Operators of over India and this took about 1 1/2 months, thus occasioning the delay.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Videocon Narmada Electronics vs Cce and Cus. Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge J Balasundaram, J T J.H.