Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vikram Cement

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Vikram Cement

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Aug 20, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/28727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Vikram Cement

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(161)ELT200TriDel

Excerpt

1. these are appeals filed by the revenue against the order of the commissioner (appeals) granting the benefit of modvat credit to the respondents on dust collecting bags for the period march-june, 1996 and on conveyor belts for periods prior to 16-3-1995.2. ld. jdr represents the appellant/revenue. there is no representation for the respondents in spite of notice.4. in the impugned order, ld. commissioner (appeals) has allowed the benefit of modvat credit to the respondents in respect of conveyor belts and dust collection bags under rule 57q of the erstwhile central excise rules, 1944 following the decisions of the hon'ble supreme court and this tribunal, cited hereunder :-century cements ltd. v. cce, raipur [1997 (95) e.l.t. 655 (tribunal)]a.c.c. ltd. v. cce, chandigarh, 5. on a perusal of the grounds raised by the appellant, i find that there is no challenge to the reliance placed by the lower appellate authority on the aforecited case law. the appellant has not disputed that the tribunal by final order no. a/940/2000-nb, dated 16-7-2001 [2001 (132) e.l.t. 662 (tribunal)] held conveyor belts to be eligible capital goods for modvat credit under rule 57q. it is also not disputed that, in century cements (supra), the tribunal held that conveyor belts and dust collecting bags were eligible capital goods under rule 57q for modvat credit. thus the issues involved in these appeals stand settled in favour of the assessee. the appeals fail and the same are rejected.

Full Judgment

1. These are appeals filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) granting the benefit of Modvat credit to the respondents on Dust Collecting Bags for the period March-June, 1996 and on Conveyor Belts for periods prior to 16-3-1995.

2. Ld. JDR represents the appellant/Revenue. There is no representation for the respondents in spite of notice.

4. In the impugned order, ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the benefit of Modvat credit to the respondents in respect of Conveyor Belts and Dust Collection Bags under Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 following the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Tribunal, cited hereunder :-Century Cements Ltd. v. CCE, Raipur [1997 (95) E.L.T. 655 (Tribunal)]A.C.C. Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh, 5. On a perusal of the grounds raised by the appellant, I find that there is no challenge to the reliance placed by the lower appellate authority on the aforecited case law. The appellant has not disputed that the Tribunal by Final Order No. A/940/2000-NB, dated 16-7-2001 [2001 (132) E.L.T. 662 (Tribunal)] held Conveyor Belts to be eligible capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. It is also not disputed that, in Century Cements (supra), the Tribunal held that Conveyor Belts and Dust Collecting Bags were eligible capital goods under Rule 57Q for Modvat credit. Thus the issues involved in these appeals stand settled in favour of the assessee. The appeals fail and the same are rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial