Sunil Behl Vs. Cc

Sunil Behl vs Cc

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 13, 2002

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/28391

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/28391
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: S T G.R., P Bajaj
Decided On: Jun 13, 2002
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Behl

Respondent

Legal References

Reported In: (2002)(83)ECC788

Excerpt

2. the appellant was directed vide stay order dated 25.5.2001 for making the pre-deposit of rs. 30 lakhs within a period of eight weeks.he failed to comply with this order and his appeal was ordered to be dismissed vide order dated 8.1.2002. however, he was given liberty to get the appeal revived in case he was able to show the compliance with the stay order on or before 13.5.2002, but he has still failed to comply with the stay order dated 25.5.2001. he has, however, filed the application seeking extension of time for making pre-deposit in order to get his appeal revived for hearing on merits. he has appeared in person and requested for extension of time on the ground that his entire money is blocked and the income tax department is taking long time in finalizing his income tax liabilities. he has also produced a copy of the letter issued by the director (itcc), vide which he has been informed to get in touch with director (v&l), central board of direct taxes. therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the appellant to get his appeal restored within thirty days, if he makes the pre-deposit of the amount in terms of the stay order of the tribunal, referred to above, on or before 3.10.2002.the period of thirty days will be available to him from the date of the deposit.

Full Judgment

2. The appellant was directed vide stay order dated 25.5.2001 for making the pre-deposit of Rs. 30 lakhs within a period of eight weeks.

He failed to comply with this order and his appeal was ordered to be dismissed vide order dated 8.1.2002. However, he was given liberty to get the appeal revived in case he was able to show the compliance with the stay order on or before 13.5.2002, but he has still failed to comply with the stay order dated 25.5.2001. He has, however, filed the application seeking extension of time for making pre-deposit in order to get his appeal revived for hearing on merits. He has appeared in person and requested for extension of time on the ground that his entire money is blocked and the Income Tax Department is taking long time in finalizing his income tax liabilities. He has also produced a copy of the letter issued by the Director (ITCC), vide which he has been informed to get in touch with Director (V&L), Central Board of Direct Taxes. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the appellant to get his appeal restored within thirty days, if he makes the pre-deposit of the amount in terms of the stay order of the Tribunal, referred to above, on or before 3.10.2002.

The period of thirty days will be available to him from the date of the deposit.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Sunil Behl vs Cc Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge S T G.R., P Bajaj