Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Treto Chem Specialities (i) Pvt.

Commr. of C. Ex. vs Treto Chem Specialities (i) Pvt.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 23, 2002
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/28092

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commr. of C. Ex.

Respondent

Treto Chem Specialities (i) Pvt.

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(159)ELT620Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the application for condonation of delay of 7 days in filing of the above appeal is sought to be explained as due to difficulty in filing 7 appeals against one order-in-appeal on the same date i.e. 21-8-2001 which was the last date for filing of the appeal. this is not sufficient ground for condoning the delay. hence, we decline to condone the delay and accordingly dismiss the cod application. consequently, the appeal is also dismissed as time barred.

Full Judgment

1. The application for condonation of delay of 7 days in filing of the above appeal is sought to be explained as due to difficulty in filing 7 appeals against one Order-in-Appeal on the same date i.e. 21-8-2001 which was the last date for filing of the appeal. This is not sufficient ground for condoning the delay. Hence, we decline to condone the delay and accordingly dismiss the COD application. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed as time barred.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial